The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”) proposed new guidelines in the Federal Register on May 15, 2015 that would revise the Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs in two significant ways: (1) to permit the testing of oral fluid specimens for drugs; and (2) to include drug testing for
Drug and Alcohol Testing
Florida Governor Settles Litigation Over Drug Testing of State Workers
Litigation that began over a 2011 Executive Order (11-58) by Florida Governor Rick Scott requiring drug tests for all prospective employees and random tests for employees at all state agencies subject to gubernatorial control — about 85,000 (77 percent of all state workers) — appears to be ending. A notice of settlement has been filed…
Anonymous Second-Hand Tip Did Not Establish Reasonable Suspicion for Public Employee Drug Test
A tip regarding employee on-the-job drug use by an unidentified source, relayed second-hand by a news reporter, is insufficient to establish individualized reasonable suspicion (required under the Fourth Amendment) to require a public employee to submit to a drug test, according to a recent decision by the United States District Court for the Eastern District…
Employee’s Request to Provide Information Excusing Positive Drug Test Could Trigger Obligation to Engage in Interactive Process
An employee’s request to provide medical documentation excusing a positive drug test could trigger an employer’s obligations to engage in the interactive process, according to a recent decision by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Jodi Hammel v. SOAR Corp., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14361 (E.D.Pa. Feb. 6, 2015).…
Admissions of Drug Use By Employees Are Not The Same As Positive Test Results in Minnesota
Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson, who recently was booked on felony child abuse charges in Montgomery County, Texas, reportedly admitted that he “smoked a little weed” in violation of the conditions of his bond, which required drug testing. While giving a urine sample last month, he allegedly told an employee of the testing company…
U.S. Department of Transportation Issues Reminder to Medical Review Officers Concerning Employees’ Use of Prescription Medications
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) issued on September 30, 2014 a reminder to Medical Review Officers (MROs) concerning transportation employees’ use of prescription medications. Specifically, the reminder addressed the process to be followed when verifying drug test results of employees who use prescription medications, as well as the MRO’s obligation to raise fitness-for-duty concerns…
Failure To Report For Random Drug Test Defeats Employee’s ADA Suit
Employees regulated by U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) drug and alcohol testing regulations are required to report for drug or alcohol tests within a reasonable amount of time as determined by the employer. A failure to show up or significant delay in reporting for testing may be deemed a “refusal to test,” as a municipal…
Workplace Positive Drug Test Rates Are Increasing; Marijuana Use Surging in Colorado and Washington, New Study Shows
A new study published by Quest Diagnostics reported an increase in the workforce drug test positivity rate for the first time in ten years, fueled primarily by marijuana and amphetamines. The Quest Drug Testing Index (DTI) released on September 11, 2014 also showed a large increase in positive marijuana test results in Colorado and Washington,…
Trouble Ahead For Post-Accident Drug Testing?
Are employers at risk in their ability to conduct lawful post-accident drug and alcohol tests?
Maybe.
At least that is the answer for the many employers who are subject to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s recordkeeping rule (29 CFR Part 1904).
OSHA, in a “Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” published recently in the Federal…
Drug Test Triggered by Discovery of Drug Paraphernalia Did Not Violate Public Employee’s Fourth Amendment Rights
A “reasonable suspicion” drug test triggered by an employer’s discovery of apparent drug paraphernalia did not violate a public employee’s Fourth Amendment rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, a court in Arkansas has held. Brotherton v. Hill, No. 4:12-cv-534 (E.D Ark. Sept. 4, 2014).
Brotherton worked as a boiler operator at the…